resolution on Windows 7: 1920 × 1088 pixels for both software and DXVA decoding resolution: 4096 × 2304 pixels (currently any resolution higher than Full HD will be cropped)

Chroma Formats: 4:2:0 chroma or monochrome are supported.

Baseline, Main, and High profiles up to level 5.1 are supported.

H.263 is not supported with ATI graphic cards.

Video Decoder for Avid DNxHD® does not yet support Apple silicon, but can be used on Macs with Apple CPU if the host application is launched in Rosetta mode. The license for Video Decoder for Avid DNxHD® requires a USB-eLicenser. Import and playback of videos encoded with Avid DNxHD or Avid DNxHR requires Video Decoder for Avid DNxHD® licensed by Avid, which is available in our online shop. *'Video Decoder for Avid DNxHD®' license required (see below) Avid DNxHD and Avid DNxHR

Recommended codecs and encoding settings.

Supported embedded audio formats for 'Extract Audio From Video File'.

(Video was not a feature in older WaveLab versions and Dorico 1.) Content overview

Information on video support in older Cubase and Nuendo versions can be found here. just Nuendo has the edge I feel.Please note that this article refers to Nuendo 8 or later, Cubase 9.0.30 or later, WaveLab 10 or later, Dorico 2 or later and VST Live.

Control Room is superb to have at your fingertips. For example, I can toggle any automation mode I want with key commands, along with prevew/suspend/punch etc.

VCAs had problems, and there's still one quirk with an easy workaround, but generally much better. I get annoyed with PT because I miss my Nuendo, and vice versa. Feels like a bit more of a headache to deal with.Įditing is really 'six of one half-a-dozen the other'. It just feels that in a full production environment PT is a bit of a bodge with a bunch of associated third-party soft- and hardware added to make it all work. Both programs will have bugs, both will have annoying quirks, both are at the mercy of the hardware they're running on, but generally speaking I'd take Nuendo any day. In general I think both programs are great, but I really do think Nuendo has the edge objectively speaking. ADR recording workflow with streamers etc, Spotting for ADR and Foley,Īnd in addition to a lot of that Steinberg also has it's own solution for remote collaboration which allows you to have talent remotely yet sync local video playback, replace transmitted audio with full-res, have swipes.

Cubase 11 vs nuendo 11